Organizing Academic Research Papers: 8. The Discussion.
The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but the discussion does not simply repeat or rearrange the first parts of your paper; the discussion clearly explain how your study advanced the reader's understanding of the research problem from.
A research paper recommender system would greatly help researchers to find the most desirable papers, Although this list suggests that there is a simple, linear process to writing such a paper, the actual process of writing a research paper.
The second to last step in conducting a research study is to interpret the findings in the Discussion section, draw conclusions, and make recommendations. It is important that everything in this last section is based off of the results of the data analysis. In an empirical research study, the conclusions and recommendations must be directly.
Discussion papers differ from standard working papers in that they are more broadly accessible and offer a more balanced perspective. While partly based on original research, they place the analysis in the wider context of the literature on the topic and also explicitly consider the policy perspective.
What follows is a hypothetical example of a research paper based on an experiment. The experiment: Say you have just conducted the Milgram Study. Now you want to write the research paper for it. (Milgram actually waited two years before writing about his study.) Here's a shortened example of a research article that MIGHT have been written.
The discussion section is a crucial section of your dissertation. The discussion section links the results of your research to the conclusions you are drawing, explaining how you use your data to explain your results. Before you present your data, you should explain again, very briefly, the purpose and scope of your research study.
A good strategy is to always re-read the background section of your paper after you have written up your results to ensure that the reader has enough context to understand the results (and, later, how you interpreted the results in the discussion section of your paper).
For a qualitative paper, although there is no need for statistical analysis of data, there is still a need to interpret the results for your audience in the Discussion section. Here's how you should write this section: 1. Begin by discussing the research question and talking about whether it was answered in the research paper based on the.
Research by CEPR Research Fellows and Affiliates appears initially in the CEPR Discussion Paper series. These Discussion Papers are circulated widely to other specialists in the research and policy community so that the results of the research receive prompt and thorough professional scrutiny. The Centre produces more than 800 Discussion Papers each year and has an archive of.
Writing the Discussion. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's.
What is the difference between results, discussion, and conclusions in writing a research paper?
Submission procedure Procedure for academic staff in DERS to submit discussion papers. Send Paul Hodgson an email with your paper as a pdf attachment; Include the text of your abstract, keywords and JEL classification(s) within the body of that email.
Discussion Essay, how to write it. Discussion Essay. Discussions are competent deliberations, which are embedded within knowledge. A productive and a tactful discussion must consider both the opposing viewpoints thus resulting in a balanced view in the whole paper.
